It does. A unified identity, core values, language. That is what makes a nation, and that is what we are pissing away.
Superbowl 60 Patriots vs Seahags Discussion
- Thread starter Lord Guts
- Start date
I think we’re overstating what “unified identity” means.
Over 67 million Americans speak a language other than English at home. More than 40 million speak Spanish. That’s not fringe, that’s part of the country.
And the Super Bowl isn’t just an American broadcast. It airs in 180+ countries. The NFL plays games in Mexico, Germany, and the UK. They’re building a global product.
So a Spanish-language artist on that stage isn’t “pissing away” identity. It reflects the audience the league is actively courting.
Core values — liberty, rule of law, opportunity — aren’t tied to halftime lyrics. If unity hinges on a 12-minute concert being in English, that’s a pretty thin definition of national strength.
People can dislike the performance. That’s fair.
But calling it national erosion feels like a huge stretch.
It's a symptom of the greater issue. We celebrate anti-American shit like Bunny and many others. Go back less than 100 years and you see immigrants who can't wait for the chance to integrate and live the dream. Now we applaud them for not giving in and forcing the rest of America to adapt to them.
The only overstating here has been by you. And oddly enough, you've done that because you've chosen to deliberately ignore the reality of the language and family friendliness issues, both of which remain the same today as they have for decades.
I think that framing skips some history.
Less than 100 years ago, immigrants were absolutely pressured to integrate and they were also criticized for not doing it fast enough. Italians, Irish, Jews, Germans all were accused at different points of not assimilating, not speaking English “properly,” not fitting the culture. That tension isn’t new.
And today’s immigrants do integrate. Second-generation language shift data consistently shows English becomes dominant by the second generation in the U.S. That pattern hasn’t changed much in a century.
Also, performing in Spanish isn’t “anti-American.” Spanish has been spoken in parts of what is now the United States longer than English has. Puerto Ricans are U.S. citizens. Millions of Americans are bilingual. That’s not forcing adaptation, that’s demographic reality.
The NFL putting a global artist on a global stage isn’t celebrating anti-American anything. It’s reflecting where the audience actually is.
We can debate taste. We can debate whether the performance was good. But calling multilingual America “anti-American” ignores the fact that this country has always absorbed new cultures, adapted, and evolved.
I’m not ignoring those points. I just don’t agree they prove what you think they prove.
English is the dominant language here. No argument. But dominance doesn’t equal exclusivity, especially for a league that markets globally and to millions of bilingual Americans.
And “family friendly” has always been flexible when it comes to halftime. We’ve had provocative choreography, suggestive lyrics, etc. That’s not me overstating it. That’s history.
So when those standards suddenly feel absolute in this case, it’s fair to question why.
But pointing to language and “family friendliness” as fixed, untouched standards over decades doesn’t line up with how the halftime show has actually operated.
Bunny himself is anti-American.
??? He’s a U.S. citizen from Puerto Rico. He has criticized US government polices but what artist doesn't do that?
Damn I didn’t realize you were such a leftist fag. This is some beta level shit right here. I actually hope you’re Latino so it isn’t such a gay capitulation. If we were a wolf pack I’d suggest we all maul you to death for acting super gay and suspect.
the NFL can make this right by having Bad Bunny executed live at next year's half time show
We’re talking about a football halftime show.
You jumped to “maul you to death.”
And I’m the beta?
P.S. I voted for Trump 3 times.
There is a nice place between being ashamed of your culture, which you shouldn't be, and having be something that people who are already citizens have to work around and cater to.
We didn't used to have to educate children in the language of the country from which they came. now we do when it comes to Spanish. we didn't used to have to teach English as a second language. Now we cater to that by providing them with interpreters when they're stopped by police, providing them with interpreters at the license bureau. Et cetera. that's how we wind up with people who can't speak english and read signs driving trucks that are killing people because they can't read signs and they don't speak english.
I'm not debating about bad bunny.The nfl will do what they feel is best for marketing.But that is a more general topic i'm speaking about above which dovetails with this a bit. i also despise globalization that is one reason why I won't give the nfl any of my money anymore.
I think there’s a difference between “catering” and dealing with reality.
The U.S. has always had waves of immigrants who didn’t speak English when they arrived. Schools adapted then too. ESL isn’t new. And historically, English becomes dominant by the second generation. That pattern hasn’t changed.
Providing interpreters in legal or licensing situations isn’t cultural surrender. It’s about clarity, due process, and liability. That’s governance, not capitulation.
As for truck safety, federal law already requires commercial drivers to demonstrate English proficiency. If enforcement fails, that’s a regulatory issue — not proof that multilingualism is the problem.
I get concerns about globalization. I have mine too. But that’s a bigger debate.
But multilingual America isn’t new, and it hasn’t historically erased national identity. The country has absorbed language waves before without losing itself.
I haven’t complained about Bad Bunny once because it’s peanuts compared to the Epstein files, the war in the Ukraine, open-borders, etc, but to write out a War & Peace manifesto defending and justifying the internationalization of America in defense of a anti-American halftime show is straight up leftist cringe.
A few paragraphs in and I spent the entire read wondering which Soyjak you are.
In the past, it was on the immigrant to assimilate culturally and language wise.Now it is on us to accommodate them.It is a paradigm shift that i am not in favor of.
If it’s “peanuts,” then why the reaction when someone analyzes it?
We can care about major geopolitical issues and still talk about culture. Those aren’t mutually exclusive.
And calling a few paragraphs a “War & Peace manifesto” doesn’t change what it was — a discussion about a business decision by a global league.
If that reads as ideological to you, maybe you’re filtering culture through politics more than I am.
Disagreeing about a halftime show doesn’t make someone a leftist.
It just means we disagree.
Calling this a “paradigm shift” suggests something fundamentally new is happening.
It isn’t.
The U.S. has always accommodated immigrants during transition periods. German-language schools, bilingual cities, multilingual government documents in the 1800s. English still became dominant.
And the pattern hasn’t changed: first generation speaks their native language, second generation is bilingual, third generation is mostly English-speaking.
That’s not a reversal of responsibility. That’s the assimilation cycle functioning.
If assimilation had actually stopped, you’d see permanent, expanding non-English enclaves.
You don’t.
So this isn’t a paradigm shift.
It’s the same process — just more visible.
It’s a conquest and Westerners have been groomed for it by Epstein-types for decades & generations, hence Mazz22.
Damn, the NFL always wins. You went full shadow-conspiracy over a halftime set, and meanwhile the NFL got a week of headlines from a game nobody wants to rewatch. LOL
We have elected officials pledging fealty to their home country instead of ours. I'd say it's a problem.You must be a hell of a lot younger than I am.I also have a bunch of older friends whose parents were 1st generation American or who came over from other countries. And they ALL assimilated to us. some 1st gen americans wouldn't even allow their native language to be spoken in their home. They were extra careful about their behavior around longtime americans, such that they would not seem foreign or reinforce stereotypes. these people that are coming in here now, illegally are not by and large assimilating to us. We are accommodating their religious beliefs. We're accommodating all of their practices. And we are over accommodating their languages. I am old enough to remember long before we used to have to press for english when we called a company. Let alone go walking in a home depot and see signs in spanish and in english.
