Justified?


Gut reaction - yes. This isn't a case of (which a search say sis extremely unlikely) of tubes partially reconnecting. This is a case of fraud, perpetrated on the patient and insurance carrier.

I would even say there should be criminal charges, revocation of the medical license, and would even support the malpractice insurance carrier denying any claim related to this.
 
Gut reaction - yes. This isn't a case of (which a search say sis extremely unlikely) of tubes partially reconnecting. This is a case of fraud, perpetrated on the patient and insurance carrier.

I would even say there should be criminal charges, revocation of the medical license, and would even support the malpractice insurance carrier denying any claim related to this.
Do you think it should be a one time settlement, or continuing monthly child support payments until the child reaches adulthood?
 
Back
Top