A consumer thread

Every state that has legalized it has seen a downturn ... more crime, more homelessness. Colorado, Mass ... falling apart.

A line was drawn long ago - weed, heroin, hash, coke - all of it should be illegal.
I like facts rather than speculation:

Research priorities identified by Fischer and his colleagues (Fischer et al., 2021) call for more studies examining the potential legalization-related spillover effects on property crime and violent crime. Studies in the US documenting the effects of cannabis legalization over the last decade show that while there may have been immediate increases in crime observed in some states [Oregon and Colorado (Freisthler et al., 2017; Hughes et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2021)] and a significant decrease in others [e.g., Washington State (Dragone et al., 2019)], there have been no long-term shifts in crime rates overall [cf. (Lu et al., 2021; Maier et al., 2017)].
" The present study corroborates these findings with Canadian data demonstrating that there is no evidence of associations between cannabis legalization and changes in subsequent patterns of property or violent crimes among male or female youth."

I love my freedoms which is why I'm on this site instead of another one. I'm free, white and over 21 and I make my own choices . Fuck the government telling me what I can and can't do as long as I'm not hurting anyone.
 
Every state that has legalized it has seen a downturn ... more crime, more homelessness. Colorado, Mass ... falling apart.

A line was drawn long ago - weed, heroin, hash, coke - all of it should be illegal.
I think there is correlation but that's because of the politics that got them there, not because weed specifically is legal. More gun control, more crime, more illegals and welfare, more liberal judges who are soft on crime, methadone clinics, etc. Now there is a difference between being decriminalized and "legal", see Maine for example where most of the legal weed is grown by Chinese cartels. It sure as shit should be decriminalized everywhere, but the government can't let an opportunity to tax the shit out of it, and certainly commit fraud while bankrupting every home-grower who sold it to his friends for a bit of extra cash.
 
If you try arguing that weed is not bad, you've already lost the argument. If you try arguing "but booze" you've already lost the argument. The argument for legalization is the freedom argument, a/k/a it's neither the Fedgov's business nor in its authority. That argument has the benefit of being both correct and persuasive.
 
As for the "but crime" argument of those who would keep it legal, "but crime" can be used against pretty much anything. It's so overused that it's meaningless. It's nothing really different than "if it saves one life!".
 
Stop shopping at Wegman's:

Wegmans in New York City has begun collecting biometric data from anyone who enters its supermarkets, according to new signage posted at the chain's Manhattan and Brooklyn locations earlier this month.

Anyone entering the store could have data on their face, eyes and voices collected and stored by the Rochester-headquartered supermarket chain. The information is used to "protect the safety and security of our patrons and employees," according to the signage. The new scanning policy is an expansion of a 2024 pilot.

The chain had initially said that the scanning system was only for a small group of employees and promised to delete any biometric data it collected from shoppers during the pilot rollout. The new notice makes no such assurances...

NYC Wegmans is storing biometric data on shoppers' eyes, voices and faces
 
I'm hoping that's not just a pilot program and that it stops at those stores. that store is amazing.


The surveillance state, public and private, will keep growing unless we slap it down. Frankly, Wegman's probably needs to get put out of business as a warning to others.
 
In development, and probably going to be difficult to make it worth the money, at least at first, but the idea is interesting, IMO, to say the least:


Dan and Jenny Berens stood before a room full of judges at Gillette College’s Old Main Presentation Hall, defending an invention born from a simple frustration: The daily demands of backyard chickens.

The Sheridan couple had eight minutes to make their case for the Hen Hub, a smart-home system that automates chicken coop care. Then came the questions.

“It was a little bit intimidating,” said Dan Berens, recalling the event back in November. “People … they didn’t hold back as far as criticisms and wanting to answer hard questions about how it would work or who would buy it.”...

How Sheridan Couple Invented An Automated 'Smart' Coop For Backyard Chickens
 
Last edited:
They were trying to force acceptance of electric vehicles by completely eliminating gas powered options, and they'd do it again, but it was a mistake. FFS..... It's a good thing for the company that this guy is gone:


Back in February 2019, Porsche announced that the following generation of the immensely popular Macan crossover, one of its best sellers, would only be available with electric power. The EV launched in early 2024, and by then, the world’s view of how quickly all-electric mobility would be adopted changed, and Porsche’s former CEO has now admitted that it was a mistake. In an interview with German publication Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, published in his final month at the reins of the automaker, Oliver Blume admitted the blunder: “Our strategy was to offer combustion engines, hybrids, and electric sports cars in each of our three segments — but not for every product. We were wrong about the Macan.” This is the second time in recent weeks that Blume has admitted a misjudgment on Porsche’s part.
The former CEO (who has now been replaced by former Ferrari and McLaren man Dr. Michael Leiters as of January 1) justified the decision to cull the combustion-powered Macan back then but added that things would be different if the call were made in today’s climate. “Based on the data available at the time and our assessment of our markets, we would make the same decision again,” said Blume. “Today, the situation is different. We have responded and are adding combustion engines and hybrids.” This miscalculation has been mirrored by Stellantis with the Dodge Charger...

Porsche: “We Were Wrong” to Replace the Gas Macan with an EV
 
@everyone


More than 38,000 cases of frozen tater tots sold in 26 states are being recalled over concerns they may contain plastic fragments.

McCain Foods USA Inc., based in Idaho, has issued a voluntary recall of approximately 38,853 cases of frozen tater tot products, including Ore-Ida Tater Tots and Sysco Imperial Potato Tater Barrels, according to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).



The FDA said the recalled products may be contaminated with "clear, hard plastic fragments," posing a potential safety risk to consumers.




About 17,597 cases of Sysco Imperial Potato Tater Barrels are also affected. Product details include:

  • Item number: 1000006067
  • Weight: 6/5 pounds
  • UPC 1 07 34730 62740 0
  • Batch codes: 1005482717, 1005483735, 1005484702, 1005485462, 1005485660
The recall comes amid a string of recent food safety alerts issued by the FDA.

fda.jpeg

A sign for the FDA is seen outside the headquarters on July 20, 2020, in White Oak, Maryland. (Sarah Silbiger/Getty Images)

Expand
Last month, Danone U.S. issued a recall for pints of its So Delicious Dairy Free Salted Caramel Cluster Non-Dairy Frozen Dessert that were sold at retail stores across the country.

A recall of 5-ounce holiday bark products sold at Aldi stores across the country was also expanded amid concerns the treats may contain undeclared allergens, including pecans and wheat, according to the FDA.

McCain Foods USA Inc. did not immediately respond to FOX Business' request for comment

 
Back
Top