Offensive Memes: Lord Sensei chokes on Eagle sized loads

[Dingleberry]

"offensive-memes-lord-chevy-has-AN-indian-boy-toy-THAT-fills-him-with-curry-jizz-every-night"

Wait! Why am I grammar and spell checking my own roast?

@Lord Guts

"...an Indian boy toy WHO fills him..."

 

[Lord Chevy]

@Lord Guts

"...an Indian boy toy WHO fills him..."

Isn't either appropriate? We are using American here, not English.

 

[Dingleberry]

Isn't either appropriate? We are using American here, not English.

A person is a who. An object is a that. It's true whether American English or British English.

I never correct grammar, but Gutsy called me into this so why not?

 

[Lord Chevy]

A person is a who. An object is a that. It's true whether American English or British English.

I never correct grammar, but Gutsy called me into this so why not?

Ah, but the boy-toy may be no more than an object to me. Therefore, "that" is correct.

(wondering how long this debate would last at Ian's House of Simp)

 

[Dingleberry]

Ah, but the boy-toy may be no more than an object to me. Therefore, "that" is correct.

(wondering how long this debate would last at Ian's House of Simp)

A toy would be a that. However, this is clearly a living breathing boy who is injecting you with love.

He's a who. Enjoy him.

 

[Deus Irae]

Goatze, or whatever the fuck that guy/band name was, used "somebody THAT I used to know", so I think we can all admit that he/it should be the final arbiter here, even though he/it was actually wrong.

 

[Lord Chevy]

Well, well.

First - I have @Dingleberry defending pronoun related speech.

Second - Who said the boy-toy was alive. Rigor does last a while if the body is properly chilled.

 

[Dingleberry]

Well, well.

First - I have @Dingleberry defending pronoun related speech.

Second - Who said the boy-toy was alive. Rigor does last a while if the body is properly chilled.

First - Dingle is defending the rules of grammar. "Who" is not a gender pronoun and thus not in the woketard realm.

Second - A dead human would still be a grammatical who.

 

[HSanders]

A person is a who. An object is a that. It's true whether American English or British English.

I never correct grammar, but Gutsy called me into this so why not?

This is something that always messes me up in italian because they never use "who"(chi). it's always "that"(che). the only time they use who is when they're asking a question and it falls at the beginning of the sentence.

 

[Dingleberry]

This is something that always messes me up in italian because they never use "who"(chi). it's always "that"(che). the only time they use who is when they're asking a question and it falls at the beginning of the sentence.

Shaddup a ya face.

 

[HSanders]

Shaddup a ya face.

whattsamatter you?

 

[Lord Chevy]

whattsamatter you?

Tell me more about these Italian hootchies and hootchays ... I assume the latter is a bit classier?

 

[Deus Irae]

 

[Lord Guts]

@LordSensei1958

 

[LordSensei1958]

@LordSensei1958

Yes?