NFL Memes

[giantsownbrady]

Well, yes. 7 Valid Rings + 0 Cheater Rings = 7 total rings

Brady:

Before Spygate - 3-0 in Super Bowls (100% winning percentage)

After Spygate- 4-3 in Super Bowls (barely above .500)

Therefore, 4-3 is his record in Super Bowls without him or his team cheating

 

[Lord Chevy]

Brady:

Before Spygate - 3-0 in Super Bowls

After Spygate- 4-3 in Super Bowls

4-3 in Super Bowls is his record without him or his team cheating

Ask any coach ... they all said the same thing. Cameras were meaningless. And, remember, the FILMING was not against any established rule. Just that the camera wasn't enclosed by 3 walls and a roof.

And, at the time, it was a memo, not a rule approved by the competition committee.

And, just to go further, cameras don't cause pick-6's, poor tackling on a critical crosser, amazing kicks in the snow, KO's out of bounds, an opposing QB dry heaving in the huddle (or his coach failing at clock management), or many other plays.

So try again, ok?

 

[Deus Irae]

Why are you people getting involved with this nonsense? If he wants to talk about Giants, that's one thing. But he's talking about a QB who literally finished his career as a .500 QB (117-117). Again, trolling is great, whether it's positive or negative, but shitty trolling is just some asshole posting garbage.



At least make him up his game.

 

[giantsownbrady]

Ask any coach ... they all said the same thing. Cameras were meaningless. And, remember, the FILMING was not against any established rule. Just that the camera wasn't enclosed by 3 walls and a roof.

There was no rule that said you could point a camera at a sideline of another team, even from a closed area. Wasn't your team caught a second time filming from a closed area against the Bengals? Certain team filming was allowed from a booth but you could not videotape other team's signals. Your statement is a complete myth. Cameras were meaningless? Care to guess why your head coach did it for 7 years before getting caught? My guess is the team was getting a significant advantege and that helped a young QB who was a nobody in college.

And, at the time, it was a memo, not a rule approved by the competition committee.

The memo reiterated an already established rule. Next.

And, just to go further, cameras don't cause pick-6's, poor tackling on a critical crosser, amazing kicks in the snow, KO's out of bounds, an opposing QB dry heaving in the huddle (or his coach failing at clock management), or many other plays.

No but it helps you tilt games and get home field advantage. Foxborough was kind of a tough place to play in the playoffs, no?

So try again, ok?

I just did. I win.

 

[LordSensei1958]

Why are you people getting involved with this nonsense? If he wants to talk about Giants, that's one thing. But he's talking about a QB who literally finished his career as a .500 QB (117-117). Again, trolling is great, whether it's positive or negative, but shitty trolling is just some asshole posting garbage.



At least make him up his game.

Boredom. Like a cat playing with a mouse. I wanted to see if he could come up with something intelligent to say, but he/she/it/they/them failed miserably. That "trolling" would be substandard even at SIforkids.com.

 

[Lord Chevy]

Care to guess why your head coach did it for 7 years before getting caught? My guess is the team was getting a significant advantege and that helped a young QB who was a nobody in college.

BB was well known for finding the loopholes and spaces in the rules. Didn't break them, but was excellent at making the Band of 32 say "Shit, we didn't think of that!". Like the eligible/ineligible lines v Baltimore that had Harbaugh crying.

And you call Brady a nobody at Michigan? Ok ... sure. Just the best QB they had for his entire tenure, set aside for big name recruits, and called back in when the win was needed and the "names" weren't getting it done.

 

[giantsownbrady]

BB was well known for finding the loopholes and spaces in the rules. Didn't break them, but was excellent at making the Band of 32 say "Shit, we didn't think of that!". Like the eligible/ineligible lines v Baltimore that had Harbaugh crying.

Wrong. He broke them and went to great lengths to hide what he was doing. And he did it for a reason - it helped him win games. Otherwise, he'd be a colossal idiot, which we know he's not. There's a reason why you lost a first round pick and fined 500K. Last time I checked there was no fine for the Baltimore crap.

And you call Brady a nobody at Michigan? Ok ... sure. Just the best QB they had for his entire tenure, set aside for big name recruits, and called back in when the win was needed and the "names" weren't getting it done.

6th round pick. To NFL teams, including the Patriots, he was a nobody. Spygate lifted him and made him relevant.

 

[giantsownbrady]

Why are you people getting involved with this nonsense? If he wants to talk about Giants, that's one thing. But he's talking about a QB who literally finished his career as a .500 QB (117-117). Again, trolling is great, whether it's positive or negative, but shitty trolling is just some asshole posting garbage.



At least make him up his game.

I'm sorry, did you think I was trolling about Spygate? I wasn't. I was telling the truth. My bad.

 

[tabmixer]

There was no rule that said you could point a camera at a sideline of another team, even from a closed area. Wasn't your team caught a second time filming from a closed area against the Bengals? Certain team filming was allowed from a booth but you could not videotape other team's signals. Your statement is a complete myth. Cameras were meaningless? Care to guess why your head coach did it for 7 years before getting caught? My guess is the team was getting a significant advantege and that helped a young QB who was a nobody in college.



The memo reiterated an already established rule. Next.



No but it helps you tilt games and get home field advantage. Foxborough was kind of a tough place to play in the playoffs, no?


I just did. I win.

Spygate is overblown. Cowher, Jimmy Johnson, other notable HC all have stated they did it themselves. The Patriots got even better after Spygate lol. Just take the L bro. Besides you're a Giants fan you're probably the only fan base who can gloat vs the Patriots.

They're the greatest dynasty ever and this is coming from a Patriots hater

 

[LordSensei1958]

Spygate is overblown. Cowher, Jimmy Johnson, other notable HC all have stated they did it themselves. The Patriots got even better after Spygate lol. Just take the L bro. Besides you're a Giants fan you're probably the only fan base who can gloat vs the Patriots.

They're the greatest dynasty ever and this is coming from a Patriots hater

I don't know if you knew this or not, but we'll be seeing the Vikings in the preseason. They're visiting the Vikings August 16th.

 

[giantsownbrady]

Spygate is overblown. Cowher, Jimmy Johnson, other notable HC all have stated they did it themselves. The Patriots got even better after Spygate lol. Just take the L bro. Besides you're a Giants fan you're probably the only fan base who can gloat vs the Patriots.

No, the logic doesn't side with this.

1) The Pats videotaped their opponents for 7 years before getting caught. They obviously made the spying work. Otherwise, no idiot coach would do it for that long for little to no reason. Other coaches tried and gave up because they couldn't make it work.

2) They kept doing after they were told to stop by the league. If it weren't that effective, commonsense tells you they would have stopped. They didn't.

3) Their former OC, Josh McDaniels, took that practice with him to Denver. Again, if it weren't effective, he wouldn't have done it.

4) The Pats most certainly did not get better after Spygate. In fact, it took them 8 years to figure out how to win a SB after getting caught.

They're the greatest dynasty ever and this is coming from a Patriots hater

No, they're not. They got caught cheating multiple times. It took that particular "dynasty" fifteen years to win their first super bowl without spying on their opponents. That's not the mark of a great dynasty.

 

[Mazz22]

Why are you people getting involved with this nonsense? If he wants to talk about Giants, that's one thing. But he's talking about a QB who literally finished his career as a .500 QB (117-117). Again, trolling is great, whether it's positive or negative, but shitty trolling is just some asshole posting garbage.



At least make him up his game.

At least make him up his game.

An impossibility when his team has sucked for the last 15 years ...

 

[Fly Eagles Fly]

No, the logic doesn't side with this.

1) The Pats videotaped their opponents for 7 years before getting caught. They obviously made the spying work. Otherwise, no idiot coach would do it for that long for little to no reason. Other coaches tried and gave up because they couldn't make it work.

2) They kept doing after they were told to stop by the league. If it weren't that effective, commonsense tells you they would have stopped. They didn't.

3) Their former OC, Josh McDaniels, took that practice with him to Denver. Again, if it weren't effective, he wouldn't have done it.

4) The Pats most certainly did not get better after Spygate. In fact, it took them 8 years to figure out how to win a SB after getting caught.



No, they're not. They got caught cheating multiple times. It took that particular "dynasty" fifteen years to win their first super bowl without spying on their opponents. That's not the mark of a great dynasty.

Hahaha another fucking Gints fan great. Now you see what I have to deal with , with these NFC East fan bases. Spygate was retarded every team did it

“They kept doing it after being warned, so it must have been valuable.”
Rebuttal:
This is a logical retardation: correlation ≠ causation. Continuing the practice doesn't prove its effectiveness—it could just show arrogance, habit, or a culture of pushing limits. Consider:

The actual “advantage” is minimal—stealing defensive signals is only helpful if they don’t change the signals, which most teams did frequently.

Tony Dungy (Colts HC): “You can try to steal signals... It’s part of football. That’s why we use code words and hand signals.”
(Source: NBC Sports)

Teams changed their signals little bro.

“Josh McDaniels brought it to Denver.”
Rebuttal:
Yes, he had a videotaping incident in Denver (
but:

He was fined, not found to be actively cheating. A videographer taped a walkthrough without McDaniels’ instruction (he didn't watch the footage either).

The Broncos self-reported the violation to the NFL.

And McDaniels went 11-17 with Denver nk advantage whatsoever hahaha

I hate the Pats I really do but Big Dick Nick Foles owns them so I can admit that they are top 1-2 greatest dynasty ever up there with those dirty fucks in Pittsburgh

 

[LordSensei1958]

Big Dick Nick Foles owns them

I was with you 100% until this.

 

[giantsownbrady]

Hahaha another fucking Gints fan great. Now you see what I have to deal with , with these AFC East fan bases. Spygate was retarded every team did it

“They kept doing it after being warned, so it must have been valuable.”
Rebuttal:
This is a logical retardation: correlation ≠ causation. Continuing the practice doesn't prove its effectiveness—it could just show arrogance, habit, or a culture of pushing limits. Consider:

The actual “advantage” is minimal—stealing defensive signals is only helpful if they don’t change the signals, which most teams did frequently.

Then why do it for 7 years if it wasn't effective? You have to be colossally stupid to continue to do something for 7 years that wasn't helpful. Again, the logic doesn't help you.

Tony Dungy (Colts HC): “You can try to steal signals... It’s part of football. That’s why we use code words and hand signals.”
(Source: NBC Sports)

Teams changed their signals little bro.

Stealing signals without videotaping is legal. What the pats did was illegal.

“Josh McDaniels brought it to Denver.”
Rebuttal:
Yes, he had a videotaping incident in Denver (
but:

He was fined, not found to be actively cheating. A videographer taped a walkthrough without McDaniels’ instruction (he didn't watch the footage either).

The videographer was Steve Scarnechia, the son of Patriots's former o-line coach of 20 years.

I hate the Pats I really do but Big Dick Nick Foles owns them so I can admit that they are top 1-2 greatest dynasty ever up there with those dirty fucks in Pittsburgh

No he doesn't. Eli owns them, as does Peyton. Nick won one game against the Pats. He's a bum.

If I were you I'd be livid. Steve Spagnuolo, when he was a defensive assistant with the Eagles in 2003, later realized that the Pats cheated their way to the 2003 super bowl vs the Eagles. This is why Spags got clever in SB 42 as the Giants DC and confused the hell out of them. You should have 3 rings by now and should have won your first SB in 2003.

 

[Fly Eagles Fly]

Then why do it for 7 years if it wasn't effective? You have to be colossally stupid to continue to do something for 7 years that wasn't helpful. Again, the logic doesn't help you.



Stealing signals without videotaping is legal. What the pats did was illegal.



The videographer was Steve Scarnechia, the son of Patriots's former o-line coach of 20 years.



No he doesn't. Eli owns them, as does Peyton. Nick won one game against the Pats. He's a bum.

If I were you I'd be livid. Steve Spagnuolo, when he was a defensive assistant with the Eagles in 2003, later realized that the Pats cheated their way to the 2003 super bowl vs the Eagles. This is why Spags got clever in SB 42 as the Giants DC and confused the hell out of them. You should have 3 rings by now and should have won your first SB in 2003.

As been stated before most coaches did it the Pats were just retarded enough to get caught when the league sent the memo. Belichick loved his own farts. As a team you always look for an edge to the ultimate limits to this day teams still do this. .

The Broncos self-reported and they sucked. As of a matter a fact all the Pats coaches outside Belichick that one Browns year have sucked without Lady Brady. It's a players game.

Nah McNabb was just a bitch

 

[giantsownbrady]

As been stated before most coaches did it the Pats were just retarded enough to get caught when the league sent the memo. Belichick loved his own farts. As a team you always look for an edge to the ultimate limits to this day teams still do this. .

There is no proof that "most coaches did it." This is just propaganda coming from Patriots fans who want to drag everyone else into their own slime.

Nah McNabb was just a bitch

Sure, but he was robbed of a SB. The Pats have been known to choke to teams that were inferior. Coughlin, who used to work with Belichick in NY, knew that Bill loved to cheat and we wised up before our SBs against him. We even had FBI agents at our super bowl practices to keep out Pats staffers who could have been lurking lol. And you guys ran a fake walkthrough before your SB against NE just in case...

 

[PM15]

Meh Spygate is like losers saying we get favored by the refs. I get it now

 

[giantsownbrady]

Meh Spygate is like losers saying we get favored by the refs. I get it now

You do get favored by the refs. Everyone knows that. The difference is the Pats cheated - that's their fault. However, if the league helps the Chiefs, it's not their fault.

 

[Dingleberry]

Meh Spygate is like losers saying we get favored by the refs. I get it now

Good growth by you! You guys do not get favored by the refs. You get blown by the refs.

By the way, the new Giants fan/Pats hater is not far removed from being a Chiefs/Mahomes hardo. For some reason, he deserted you guys and jumped to the dyke haircut dude, Jaxson Dart.